+ Antworten
Ergebnis 1 bis 10 von 12

Hybrid-Darstellung

  1. #1
    Erfahrener Benutzer
    Registriert seit
    24.01.2015
    Beiträge
    123
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 38 Times in 25 Posts
    Zitat Zitat von DboxOldie Beitrag anzeigen
    Selbst wenn jemand die SH4 Hardware in den 3er Kernel wieder einbaut, player2 Module anpasst, etc.
    Bedeutet es noch lange nicht, das es besser / schneller / stabiler läuft als mit Kernel 2.6.32.71
    I agree. Unless there is some driving need to change the kernel, I am not sure anyone has the free time for all the work required. Also there seems to be no interest from those using oe-alliance to upgrade either.

    I gave up on the duckbox developers' build environment about a year ago and switched to using oe-alliance (Taapat and MastaGs' gits). But I still use the drivers from duckbox developers. There are advantages and disadvantages to both build environments and not being a developer, I have to heavily rely on work from others. A short time ago when I noticed the dropping of enigma2 from buildsystem-ddt, I started looking into using Audioniek's git, but have not had the time to do much. If Audioniek is dedicated to continuing, I would be happy to follow his git and contribute what I can. But I only have an alien2 (spark7162) to play with...

    BTW -= I know MastaG has been testing with gcc 4.9.4, but I have not tried it yet.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to joeuser For This Useful Post:



  3. #2
    Developer
    Registriert seit
    18.07.2012
    Ort
    Ridderkerk, Niederlande
    Beiträge
    634
    Thanks
    144
    Thanked 713 Times in 304 Posts
    Zitat Zitat von joeuser Beitrag anzeigen
    But I still use the drivers from duckbox developers.
    Please note that in the drivers section the greatest difference between my git that that of duckbox-developrers exist. For the Sparks and Fortis you will find many improvements. In somewhat lesser regard this is also true for the apps and flash gits.

    Zitat Zitat von joeuser Beitrag anzeigen
    There are advantages and disadvantages to both build environments
    I agree. I spent some time with oe-alliance and abandoned it for the following reasons:
    • When building on the same machine a build with oe-alliance takes more than five times longer;
    • You need to learn a new "language": BitBake;
    • It is a lot of work to add SH4 boxes other than Sparks and I found the process cumbersome and not very logical;
    • For SH4, oe-alliance relies heavily on the gits also used by the buildsystem, so why complicate things and not use the source directly?;
    • After a build is complete, the oe-alliance system has created over a million files and needs quite a bit of diskspace.


    Regards,

    Audioniek.
    Receivers: Rebox: RE-4000, 8000, 9000, 2200, 2210, 2220, 4200, 4210, 4220, 8220, 8500, SAB Unix Triple, Golden Media Spark TripleX, Amiko Alien 2+, Sogno Spark Revolution, Kathrein UFS910(1 & 14W)/912/913/922(CX24116 & AVL2108 tuners), Vizyon revolution 820HD PVR, AB IPBox 91HD/9000HD/9000HD rev.2, Xsarius Alpha HD10, nBox BKSA/BSLA/BXZB/BZZB, Vitamin HD 5000
    Sats: Astra 1, 2 & 3, Hotbird
    Main activity: building my own E2 images for Fortis receivers

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Audioniek For This Useful Post:



Berechtigungen

  • Neue Themen erstellen: Ja
  • Themen beantworten: Ja
  • Anhänge hochladen: Ja
  • Beiträge bearbeiten: Ja
  •